Law Council weighs in on migration laws

Following the Nauru leaks, the Law Council of Australia has called for independent inspectors of immigration detention and migration laws

The Law Council of Australia is urging the establishment of offices for independent overseers for immigration detention and migration laws.
 
The suggestion comes after leaked documents published by news outlets including The Guardian detail thousands of purported assault, sexual abuse, self-harm and unfit living conditions on Australia’s offshore detention island of Nauru.
 
A significant portion of the more than 2,000 reports – all in all totalling about 8,000 pages – concern children.
 
The Law Council of Australia proposes that there is a need now more than ever to appoint an Independent Inspector of Immigration Detention and an Independent Monitor of Migration Laws.
 
“The Law Council has consistently stated that Australia  retains  responsibility for  the  health  and safety  of  asylum  seekers  transferred  to  other  countries  for  offshore  processing  and  assessment under the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees,” said Stuart Clark AM.
 
The Law Council of Australia’s president said this responsibility derives from the Commonwealth’s common law duty of care and obligations arising under international law.
 
He added that the key appointment could limit harm to asylum seekers in the future while preserving Australia’s border protection policies.
 
“An independent reviewer specific to detention centres could operate in a similar fashion to the Federal Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security. The first task of this reviewer should be to examine the disturbing reports of alleged incidents in Nauru,” Clark explained.
 
“A second independent, specialist body should be established to review and monitor Australia’s border protection legislation, similar to the role of the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor. This has proved successful in the national space, strengthening the integrity of intelligence services, whilst not undermining operational efficiency,” he continued.
 
The organisation also stressed its position that minimum legal precautions must be in place to ensure Australia’s compliance with international standards which includes limits on detention and the best interest of the child principle.
 
Furthermore, the council president emphasised the importance of government employees including contracted medical staff, being able to speak out about incidents without fear of retribution.
 
The council’s immigration detention standards position can be read in their policy statement Principles Applying to the detention of Asylum Seekers and their Asylum Seeker Policy.
 

Recent articles & video

Two ascend to Kennedys Australia partnership

Moriarty Foundation CEO on 12 years of leading the RLC

Ardea taps Clayton Utz for advice on cooperation agreement with Japanese consortium

CLC calls for frontline services funding geared towards women's safety

US law firms Troutman Pepper and Locke Lord confirm potential merger

ABA survey reveals weakening US democracy, cites misinformation as a key factor

Most Read Articles

McCullough Robertson nets former HSF Queensland environmental practice head

K&L Gates assists with launch of $190 million venture capital fund

Tamboran Resources taps SPB for advice on first long-term gas sales agreement

Baker McKenzie boosts Los Angeles team with transactional lawyers from Munger, Tolles & Olson