‘Abusive litigation tactics’ annoys US judge

The federal magistrate judge ordered parties to present disputes in just two joint statements

‘Abusive litigation tactics’ annoys US judge

A federal magistrate judge in the US thinks that litigation tactics used by parties before her court have gone too far.

“The court has indulged the parties’ abusive litigation tactics for long enough,” US Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe said in a 19 July order, according to the American Bar Association Journal.

The Nevada judge denied the pending discovery motions of the parties and required them to present their disputes using just two joint statements.

The parties had filed eight briefs of a single motion, Koppe said. For another motion to quash subpoenas, the parties went through another “briefing odyssey,” she said.

Koppe also said that lawyers of both parties “are expected to be professional and courteous to one another.” She said that the court is “not impressed by overheated rhetoric and personal attacks.”

The case is between V5 Technologies and Switch Ltd. V5, which does business as Cobalt Data Centers, allege Switch maintains control over the Las Vegas data centre market using unfair tactics.

 

Related stories:
Lawyer suspended after lewd act is caught on courthouse camera
US Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban

 

Recent articles & video

Survey reveals nearly half of junior associates feel law school did not prepare them for firm life

IBA says Meta and Ray-Ban's AI-powered smart glasses spark privacy and legal concerns

US law firms Quinn Emanuel and Morgan Lewis expand into Saudi Arabia amid regulatory changes

PsiQuantum taps HSF as lead counsel on world-first quantum computer build

Federal Court dismisses 'trainwreck' trademark infringement case

Addisons welcomes corporate star to senior ranks

Most Read Articles

Homegrown IP stars fly high at Bird & Bird

Two ascend to Kennedys Australia partnership

HSF announces new finance practice managing partner for Australia and Asia

NSW Health agrees to $230m settlement in junior doctor underpayment class action